Andrew Williams

See how we've assessed them for all policy statements included in the Build a Ballot tool. Want to suggest a revision? Send us an email at tool@buildaballot.org.au

Statement

Evidence

Score

Statement

Introduce a tax on the excess profits of large corporations (e.g. on banks, gas companies)

Assessment Criteria
1
Do not support
1.5
Close loopholes that enable multinational tax avoidance
2
Introduce a superprofits tax and close loopholes that enable multinational tax avoidance
Evidence

Type: Statement

Summary: Andrew Williams responded to our survey as being supportive of a superprofits tax and closing tax avoidance loopholes, stating: “The Australian taxpayers are carrying Australia's economy whilst the corporations are not carrying their fare share of the load in contributing to the Australian economy as they should”.

Score
2
Statement

Introduce short-term price caps (e.g. on rent and gas prices)

Assessment Criteria
1
Do not support
2
Support introducing short-term price caps
Evidence

Type: Statement

Summary: Andrew Williams responded to our survey as being supportive of capping energy prices, but not rent, stating: “With regards to rent, I am in favor of reviewing the housing and rental accessibility through reviewing negative gearing and capital gains taxes to ensure the rental market is supported to a point that prices can be controlled and that rental availability is increased”.

Score
2
Statement

Support a significant reduction of individuals employed by the public service

Assessment Criteria
1
Do not support
2
Support a significant reduction of individuals employed by the public service
Evidence

Type: Statement

Summary: Andrew Williams responded to our survey as being unsupportive of cutting public service jobs, stating: “I support a review of the public service, but a wholesale cutting of jobs for the purpose of saving money has failed in the past and will fail again. I support ensuring that the public service meets efficiency standards. I support saving money by getting public servants to do their jobs and not rely on expensive consultants to do their work - which would be another by-product of significant slashing of public service jobs”.

Score
1
Statement

Prevent big companies from controlling the market and limiting consumer choice (e.g. supermarkets)

Assessment Criteria
1
Do not support
2
Support reforming regulations that increase corporate competition
Evidence

Type: Statement

Summary: Andrew Williams responded to our survey as being supportive of reforming regulations in service of corporate competition, stating: “I want to see regulation of multiple industries including (but not limited to) banking, petroleum, supermarkets, NDIS, and aged care providers. The removal of self-regulation will hold these industries to account”.

Score
2
Statement

Phase out tax concessions for property investors (e.g. negative gearing or capital gains tax discount)

Assessment Criteria
1
Do not support
1.5
Support limiting or reducing negative gearing and capital gains tax discounts
2
Support phasing out negative gearing and capital gains tax discounts
Evidence

Type: Website

Summary: Andrew Williams supports reducing negative gearing to two properties per person, no negative gearing for foreign investors or companies. Andrew supports increasing capital gains tax for properties held for less than two years, reducing to no capital gains tax for properties held as rental properties for 20 years or more to ensure that the rental market has stable properties available.

Source: https://www.andrew4aston.com/about/

Score
1.5
Statement

Incentivise state/territory government to increase renter rights and protections

Assessment Criteria
1
Do not support
1.5
Support incentivising states/territories to strengthen renters rights and protections using existing legislation
2
Support the establishment of a National Renters Protection Authority and National Tenancy Standards, with incentives for states/territories to adopt them
Evidence

Type: Statement

Summary: Andrew Williams responded to our survey as being supportive of a National Renters Protection Authority and National Tenancy Standards, stating: “The rental crisis is not limited to one or two states, therefore national standards can help ensure that one group of renters is not more severely impacted than others. States would still have the option to opt for measures above the national standard”.

Score
2
Statement

Increase investment in public and community housing

Assessment Criteria
1
Do not support
2
Support a meaningful increase in investment
Evidence

Type: Statement

Summary: Andrew Williams responded to our survey as being supportive of investment in public and community housing, stating: “The need for purposeful public housing solutions, particularly for vulnerable persons including those fleeing domestic and family violence needs to be addressed at a national level. This must include support for regional and remote vulnerable persons”.

Score
2
Statement

Allow first home-buyers to access their super to help purchase their first home

Assessment Criteria
1
Do not support
2
Support allowing first-home buyers to access their super
Evidence

Type: Statement

Summary: Andrew Williams responded to our survey as being supportive of allowing first home-buys to access their super to help purchase their first home, stating: “Simple, this is their money and if we have more people in the housing market (providing we have the right balances to ensure that housing is affordable), then the less stress that is on the rental market”.

Score
2
Statement

Incentivise state/territory governments to increase housing supply

Assessment Criteria
1
Do not support
2
Support a meaningful increase in incentives
Evidence

Type: Statement

Summary: Andrew Williams responded to our survey as being supportive of expanding incentives that lead to increases in housing supply, stating: “This should be done through state and local government input. Issues arise in communities where state incentives do not recognise the residential amenity such as public transport, which for the likes of Aston is a real blocker to housing reform”.

Score
2
Statement

Help first-home buyers with shared equity programs that would allow participants to co-purchase a home with the government

Assessment Criteria
1
Do not support
2
Support expanding shared equity programs
Evidence

Type: Statement

Summary: Andrew Williams responded to our survey as being supportive of shared equity programs, stating: “I support this, however, it must be means tested and must be targeting to help vulnerable persons as a priority”.

Score
2
Statement

Introduce energy bill rebates

Assessment Criteria
1
Do not support
2
Support an energy bill rebate
Evidence

Type: Statement

Summary: Andrew Williams responded to our survey as being unsupportive of energy bill rebates for every household, stating: “This is an unsustainable program and should be means tested. The current program provides less than the daily cost of having an electricity account. The fees and charges that are applied should have to be justified. Given the electronic manner of smart meters, online services and electronic banking, I struggle to see that the daily costs of having an account would amount to the value that it is. Making these fees, and the costs of energy justified will provide a longer sustained program that provides real cost of living support on every bill - not just a quarterly payment that you don't see”.

Score
1
Statement

Increase financial support for energy efficiency upgrades

Assessment Criteria
1
Do not support
2
Support a meaningful increase in incentives for home and business electrification, solar, battery storage, and energy efficiency upgrades
Evidence

Type: Website

Summary: Andrew Williams supports every home with a solar system being be upgraded with a storage system. This will allow the storage of generated power to be used in peak times when the prices are the highest and will provide real cost of living support for houses.

Source: https://www.andrew4aston.com/about/

Score
2
Statement

Increase funding for community batteries that increase access to solar

Assessment Criteria
1
Do not support
2
Support increasing federal financial incentives (e.g. the Community Batteries for Household Solar program) for community batteries
Evidence

Type: Statement

Summary: Andrew Williams responded to our survey as being supportive of a meaningful increase in incentives, stating: “I would like to see Aston as a trial for all schools and community facilities to be fitted out with solar and storage (batteries) to help reduce the costs to the local clubs and groups, help reduce costs to public schools and to help reduce the use of fossil fuels”.

Score
2
Statement

Strengthen regulations to prevent price-gouging by energy companies

Assessment Criteria
1
Do not support
2
Meaningfully increase power of regulators (e.g. the ACCC and Australian Energy Regulator) to prevent price-gouging
Evidence

Type: Statement

Summary: Andrew Williams responded to our survey as being supportive of regulators having anti-price-gouging powers, stating: “I am in favor of reducing self-regulation which would be done by expanding the role of the ACCC and energy regulators in enforcement of activities such as price gouging and cartel behaviours”.

Score
2
Statement

Make university free

Assessment Criteria
1
Do not support
2
Support making university free
Evidence

Type: Website

Summary: Andrew Williams supports every Australian having their first successfully completed TAFE course, undergraduate degree, and postgraduate degree being free. Beyond the first successfully completed course, the user pays system would apply. This policy would include wiping existing HECS debt for all Australians’ first successfully completed undergraduate and postgraduate degrees.

Source: https://www.andrew4aston.com/about/

Score
2
Statement

Cut a portion of existing student debt

Assessment Criteria
1
Do not support
2
Committed to cutting at least 15% of student debt
Evidence

Type: Website

Summary: Andrew Williams supports every Australian having their first successfully completed TAFE course, undergraduate degree, and postgraduate degree being free. Beyond the first successfully completed course, the user pays system would apply. This policy would include wiping existing HECS debt for all Australians’ first successfully completed undergraduate and postgraduate degrees.

Source: https://www.andrew4aston.com/about/

Score
2
Statement

Support more fee-free TAFE places

Assessment Criteria
1
Do not support
2
Support the Free TAFE bill or comparable legislation
Evidence

Type: Website

Summary: Andrew Williams supports every Australian having their first successfully completed TAFE course, undergraduate degree, and postgraduate degree being free. Beyond the first successfully completed course, the user pays system would apply.

Source: https://www.andrew4aston.com/about/

Score
2
Statement

Increase funding for public schools

Assessment Criteria
1
Do not support
1.5
Support increasing federal share of public school funding to between 22.5% and 25%
2
Support increasing federal share of public school funding to 25% or more
Evidence

Type: Website / Statement

Summary: Andrew Williams supports all students, public and private, in receiving the 100% funding rate. In response to our survey, he also stated: “I would also want to see the removal of the diluting of the funding through capital works and other grants coming out of the school funding bucket, this should be separate funding areas”.

Source: https://www.andrew4aston.com/about/

Score
2
Statement

Increase funding for and access to childcare subsidies

Assessment Criteria
1
Do not support
2
Support meaningful increase in funding
Evidence

Type: Statement

Summary: Andrew Williams responded to our survey as being unsupportive of increasing funding for childcare subsidies, stating: “I believe that child support funding should be means tested. Those that are on >$250,000 per year should not be receiving fully funded childcare places”.

Score
1
Statement

Stop fossil fuel project approvals and expansions

Assessment Criteria
1
Not opposed to new coal or gas projects or project expansions
2
Strengthen national environment laws to stop all new coal and gas approvals and fossil fuel project expansions
Evidence

Type: Statement

Summary: Andrew Williams responded to our survey as not being opposed to new coal or gas projects, stating: “This is a loaded question. I would heavily increase the environmental impacts evaluations. I would be making it a condition of any mining application that the environment must be returned to a usable and safe environment post activity and this being a condition of the mining permit. Australia is not yet ready to be totally dependent on renewable energy. I would employ a Norway style resources tax to ensure that our community is appropriately compensated for the resources taken and sold by the mining companies”.

Score
1
Statement

Accelerate the rollout of renewable energy projects

Assessment Criteria
1
Do not support a target of 80%+ renewable energy by 2030
1.5
Committed to a target of 80–94% renewable energy by 2030, with clear policies to achieve this
2
Committed to a target of >95% renewable energy by 2030, with clear policies to achieve this
Evidence

Type: Statement

Summary: Andrew Williams responded to our survey as not supporting a target of 80%+ renewable energy by 2030, stating: “I think our focus needs to be on establishing local renewable energy programs that reduce the cost of living in the here and now. Setting targets become[s] arbitrary because there is no level of responsibility that goes with them. Let's roll out programs that are going to help homes and small businesses first, help community groups and schools, childcare and kindergartens now as a priority”.

Score
1
Statement

Strengthen policies that ensure Australia’s biggest polluters genuinely cut their emissions

Assessment Criteria
1
Support reducing or removing existing policies
1.5
Support maintaining existing policies (e.g. the Safeguard Mechanism)
2
Support strengthening existing policies (e.g. the Safeguard Mechanism)
Evidence

Type: Statement

Summary: Andrew Williams responded to our survey as being supportive of strengthening existing policies, stating: “I think we need to support reducing the emissions, which includes reducing fossil fuel emitters.”

Score
2
Statement

Increase investment in preventative health programs

Assessment Criteria
1
Do not support
2
Support a meaningful increase in investment
Evidence

Type: Statement

Summary: Andrew Williams responded to our survey as being supportive of a meaningful increase in investment in health prevention programs, stating: “I would introduce free dental and free full mental health services under Medicare and domestic family violence services.  This would all be paid for by the implementation of the Norway style resources tax.”

Score
2
Statement

Make GP visits free or more affordable by increasing bulk billing incentives

Assessment Criteria
1
Do not support
1.5
Support a meaningful increase in incentives (between $5-15 billion)
2
Support a substantial increase in incentives ($15 billion+)
Evidence

Type: Statement

Summary: Andrew Williams responded to our survey as being supportive of substantial increases in incentives, stating: “If we can provide LNG companies with >$12 billion in subsidies, then we can certainly afford to invest more in our health”.

Score
2
Statement

Increase funding to train, attract, and retain more healthcare professionals, especially in regional areas

Assessment Criteria
1
Do not support
2
Support a meaningful increase in funding
Evidence

Type: Statement

Summary: Andrew Williams responded to our survey as being supportive of increasing funding for more healthcare professionals, stating: “This goes hand in hand with increased housing availability and affordability. It is okay to have the jobs, but we need the infrastructure to attract and retain them”.

Score
2
Statement

Increase funding for dental and mental health

Assessment Criteria
1
Do not support increasing funding
1.5
Meaningful increase in funding for either dental or mental health
2
Include dental and mental health in Medicare
Evidence

Type: Statement

Summary: Andrew Williams responded to our survey as being supportive of fully including dental and mental health Medicare, stating: “… Full dental and full mental health should be covered as bulk-billed under Medicare, funded by the Norway styled resources tax”.

Score
2
Statement

Expand subsidies to make more prescription medicines cheaper

Assessment Criteria
1
Do not support
2
Support expanding subsidies through the Pharmaceutical Benefits Scheme (PBS)
Evidence

Type: Statement

Summary: Andrew Williams responded to our survey as being supportive of expanding subsidies through the PBS, stating that: “I am happy with the processes that are in place now.  Clearly I would not want to see any reduction in the PBS, which is under an unprecedented attack from the US Government who are doing the bidding for the large pharmaceutical companies”.

Score
2
Statement

Increase investment in large-scale renewable energy and storage

Assessment Criteria
1
Do not support
2
Support a meaningful increase in investment and incentives in large-scale renewable energy, storage and grid infrastructure
Evidence

Type: Website / Statement

Summary: Andrew Williams wants to see an approach which includes a greater focus on domestic solar storage. In responding to our survey, he stated: “This public/private approach is supported in the larger renewable energy sector”.

Source: https://www.andrew4aston.com/about/

Score
2
Statement

Require multinational gas companies to prioritise domestic supply, without supporting the approval of new gas projects

Assessment Criteria
1
Do not support
2
Support a domestic gas reservation scheme that does not enable new gas projects
Evidence

Type: Statement

Summary: Andrew Williams responded to our survey as being supportive of a domestic gas reservation scheme, stating: “All taxes under the proposed Norway style resources tax would be much less for domestic markets as opposed to export markets. This will make it much more affordable for the companies to provide domestic supply”.

Score
2
Statement

Invest in nuclear power as a future energy source, while extending the life of coal power and increasing gas use in the interim

Assessment Criteria
1
Do not support
2
Support developing and investing in a nuclear industry
Evidence

Type: Statement

Summary: Andrew Williams responded to our survey stating: “Loaded question - I would support examining the independent evidence relating to nuclear energy. I have far too many questions at this stage to say I would support it. I do not believe the claims from the Liberals and likewise I do not believe the claims of the Labor/Greens. I would make my decisions based on independent, credible evidence and not a glossy party pamphlet.”

Score
Statement

Improve access to government-held information about government policies and decisions

Assessment Criteria
1
Do not support
1.5
Support increased funding or introduction of statutory timeframes for review
2
Support the implementation of an immediate injection of funding for the Freedom of Information system and introduce statutory timeframes for external FOI reviews to remove backlog and delay.
Evidence

Type: Statement

Summary: Andrew Williams responded to our survey as being supportive of increased funding for the FOI system, stating: “FOI is an accountability method and we need clear and transparent accountability across government and the public sector”.

Score
2
Statement

Protect the ABC and SBS’s independence and funding

Assessment Criteria
1
Do not support
1.5
Support increasing or maintaining funding in real terms
2
Support increasing or maintaining ABC and SBS funding in real terms and implementing reforms to enable planning certainty across funding cycles.
Evidence

Type: Statement

Summary: Andrew Williams responded to our survey as being supportive of maintaining ABC and SBS funding in real terms, along with implementing funding reforms, stating: “I believe there have been some significant concerns such as millions of dollars on the Fairwork Commission unlawful dismissal claim involving the ABC. Ultimately, taxpayers are footing the bill. The ABC (and SBS) are public broadcasters and must maintain total impartiality. If this cannot be maintained then the funding would need to be reviewed”.

Score
2
Statement

Require all lobbyists that meet with politicians to be publicly disclosed

Assessment Criteria
1
Do not support
1.5
Support some but not all measures
2
Strengthen the Lobbying Code of Conduct to include a broader range of actors including in-house lobbyists, provide effective sanctions for breach of code and require the publication of ministerial diaries.
Evidence

Type: Statement

Summary: Andrew Williams responded to our survey as being supportive of strengthening the Lobbying Code of Conduct and publishing ministerial diaries, stating: “Absolutely support transparent government”.

Score
2
Statement

Make public transport more frequent and reliable

Assessment Criteria
1
Do not support
2
Support increasing incentives for state/territory governments to improve the frequency, reliability, and accessibility of shared transport (public transport, carsharing, bike sharing)
Evidence

Type: Statement

Summary: Andrew Williams responded to our survey as being supportive of incentivising improvements to public transport, stating: “Public transport is poor in Aston and has been for decades. This needs to be change[d] with the extension of the tram line to Knox City SC and rail link to Rowville”.

Score
2
Statement

Improve bike paths and footpaths to encourage active transport

Assessment Criteria
1
Do not support
2
Support increasing incentives for state/territory governments to improve bike paths and footpaths to encourage active transport
Evidence

Type: Statement

Summary: Andrew Williams responded to our survey as being supportive of incentivising state/territory governments to improve bike and footpaths, stating: “Separating bike and pedestrians from each other and from vehicle traffic is safe, healthy and smart”.

Score
2
Statement

Increase access and affordability of electric and low-emissions vehicles

Assessment Criteria
1
Support removing the New Vehicle Efficiency Standard
1.5
Support maintaining the current New Vehicle Efficiency Standard
2
Support implementing policies that strengthen the effectiveness of the New Vehicle Efficiency Standard
Evidence

Type: Statement

Summary: Andrew Williams responded to our survey as being supportive of strengthening the New Vehicle Efficiency Standard, stating: “Australia is one of the few countries that doesn’t have this... why.  Not sure I can say anything else on this by WHY?????”

Score
2

Have a question or concern?

Send us an email to tool@buildaballot.org.au. We'll look into it then get back to you as soon as possible.

Back to all assessments
No items found.